<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="0.91">
<channel>
	<title>GSNMagazine Case Studies Editorial Features Feed</title>
	<link>http://www.gsnmagazine.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<language>en</language>


	<item>
		<title>Case Study: More efficient fingerprinting in Northern Virginia</title>
		<link>http://www.gsnmagazine.com/cms/features/case-studies/627.html</link>
		<pubDate>March 26, 2008</pubDate>
		<description>
Organization: Northern Virginia Mental Health Institute (NVMHI)
Safety and Security Department
Falls Church, VA
 
The Problem: Government agencies serving vulnerable populations in Virginia must now fingerprint everyone working there, including state employees, contract staff, volunteers, medical residents, interns and clinical students. Four FBI fingerprint cards were required per applicant. This 300 percent increase in state-mandated fingerprinting siphoned off 25 percent of the security staffâ€s work time, and 50 percent of employeesâ€ orientation time. The NVMHI security chief doubled the fingerprinting staff to simultaneously fingerprint two applicants at a time. However, today&apos;s increasingly troublesome fingers still doubled the required fingerprinting time.
</description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Case Study: Greater Cleveland Transit locks onto increased revenues</title>
		<link>http://www.gsnmagazine.com/cms/features/case-studies/531.html</link>
		<pubDate>February 28, 2008</pubDate>
		<description>Company Name: Videx Inc.
Corvallis, OR

Name of Customer: Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Cleveland, OH

The Problem: Securing fare boxes on buses
The transit authority in Greater Cleveland had a problem with lost and stolen keys to the fare boxes on its buses. A review of the collection reports indicated that a significant amount of money, mostly bills, was not making it to the bank. Although there was no way to detect if the missing keys were being used to raid the fare boxes, their absence provided a wide hole in loss prevention efforts. Re-keying the boxes with conventional locks might provide a temporary fix to the problem, but that would only last until the next key was misplaced or stolen. Once again, the security of the system would be compromised. The real dilemma was determining if the losses were a result of missing keys, or if issued keys were being used to breach the fare boxes.
</description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Case Study: Ameristar supplies Impasse fence at Ontario International Airport</title>
		<link>http://www.gsnmagazine.com/cms/features/case-studies/525.html</link>
		<pubDate>February 26, 2008</pubDate>
		<description>Company Name: Ameristar Fence Products
Tulsa, OK

Name of Customer: Ontario International Airport
Ontario, CA
(Part of Los Angeles World Airports)

The Problem: Ontario International Airport wanted to meet a federal mandate requiring an 8-foot fence with a barrier in the public access areas that was aesthetically more pleasing and structurally stronger than a traditional chain link fence. Other airports had spent millions of dollars raising 6-foot and 7-foot fences to the required 8-foot height, but their taller chain link fences offered little added deterrence against intrusion.
   
</description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Case Study: L-1 Identity supplies live scan fingerprint system to State of Minnesota</title>
		<link>http://www.gsnmagazine.com/cms/features/case-studies/493.html</link>
		<pubDate>February 14, 2008</pubDate>
		<description>Company name: L-1 Identity Solutions, Inc.

Name of Customer: Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (MN BCA)

The Problem: The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) wanted a Live Scan solution for criminal booking that would be capable of capturing highly-detailed data from the entire hand, not just the fingerprint, all in one pass.
</description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>Case Study: New EOC in San Antonio by Ross &amp; Baruzzini </title>
		<link>http://www.gsnmagazine.com/cms/features/case-studies/471.html</link>
		<pubDate>February 7, 2008</pubDate>
		<description>Company name:  Ross &amp; Baruzzini

Name of Customer:  Emergency Operations Center (EOC), San Antonio, TX

The Problem:

When a public bond issue was passed in 2003 for a new, joint-use Emergency Operations Center (EOC) in San Antonio, the challenge was to create a state-of-the-art facility that was prepared to respond to catastrophic, all-hazard events. But equally important was facilitating the seamless integration and operation of previously independent city, county, regional, state and federal emergency management personnel.  
</description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>4D Security Solutions, Inc. - June &apos;07</title>
		<link>http://www.gsnmagazine.com/cms/features/case-studies/216.html</link>
		<pubDate>December 2, 2007</pubDate>
		<description>To download CASE STUDY: CLICK HERE
</description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>ADT Security Services - June &apos;07</title>
		<link>http://www.gsnmagazine.com/cms/features/case-studies/223.html</link>
		<pubDate>December 2, 2007</pubDate>
		<description>To download CASE STUDY: CLICK HERE
</description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title>B.I.G. Enterprises, Inc. - June &apos;07</title>
		<link>http://www.gsnmagazine.com/cms/features/case-studies/213.html</link>
		<pubDate>December 1, 2007</pubDate>
		<description>To download CASE STUDY: CLICK HERE
</description>
	</item>


</channel>
</rss>