Technology Sectors

Market Sectors

Intelligence failures over Christmas remind politicians of 9/11

Abdulmutallab

The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has finally released its unclassified executive summary of the investigation into the government's failures leading up to the attempted 2009 Christmas Day terrorist attack in the skies over Detroit.

The 14 failures specified by the committee read like a laundry list of intelligence mishaps, reminiscent of those issued by the 9/11 Commission almost a decade ago. The scathing report primarily slams the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), the agency created after the 2001 attacks to be a clearinghouse for the intelligence community (IC) on all terrorism threats, for not identifying Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab before he boarded a flight to the U.S. in December. But, the redacted summary also makes clear that the committee has discovered the continued existence of numerous systemic failures within the CIA, the FBI, the NSA and even the Department of State (DoS), all of which contributed to the attack.

In a letter accompanying the summary from Senators Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) and Richard Burr (R-NC), the lawmakers wrote, "DNI Blair stated that, ‘this was not a failure to connect, integrate, and understand the intelligence we had…,’ We respectfully disagree. Some of the systemic errors this review identified also were cited as failures prior to 9/11.”

The 14 points of failure identified by the committee are labeled as "a series of human errors, technical problems, systemic obstacles, analytical misjudgments and competing priorities.” They include:

-       The failure of DoS to revoke Abdulmutallab’s visa because they did not use their “independent obligation to evaluate a non-U.S. person’s suitability for entry into the U.S., but instead relie[d] on the IC’s assessment of whether an individual meets the standard for placement on the terrorist watchlists”;

-       The fact that Abdulmuttalab was not placed in the “Terrorist Screening Database” (TSDB) because the standards “were interpreted too rigidly;"

-       Intelligence was “inconsistently” distributed to the agencies with a need-to-know;

-       Because intelligence was not properly disseminated, the wrong database searches were undertaken on Abdulmuttalab, leaving analysts (especially at the FBI) unaware of reports issued about him and were therefore unable to “connect the dots” of intelligence from across the intelligence community;

-       Faulty computer configurations for analysts at the FBI prevented them from gaining access to necessary databases which would have provided them conclusive information on Abdulmuttalab;

-       The CIA kept important information within the agency that should have been disseminated more widely;

-       The failure of the NCTC to bring together fragmented reporting from across the intelligence community;

-       The failure of the NSA to pursue potential information, connect that information and focus on direct threats to the homeland, rather than just on general threats of terrorism worldwide;

-       The failure of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to make clear to the intelligence community -- despite having a mandate from the government -- as to whom is responsible for the collection, dissemination and analysis of information.

Read the full findings of the report, here.

 

Recent Videos

It's been a banner year for the Whitestone Group, according to John Clark, CEO of the facility security, asset/force protection and investigations...
Jeff Horne explains that Denver, CO-based Accuvant , Inc has two different businesses – the Value Added Reseller (VAR) side, in which it is one of...
GSN caught up with Dave Natelson for a quick interview at the Cocktail Reception at the 2011 Awards Dinner, before he learned that Nasatka had earned...
Ann Pickren discusses MIR3’s Mass Notification System that was awarded a Winner’s Trophy in GSN’s 2011 Homeland Security Awards Program. She explains...
Former Coast Guard Commandant Thad Allen, who served through a long and distinguished career in the United States Coast Guard and later answered the...

Upcoming Events

Event Details Dates of Event
SANS Phoenix 2012 Feb 13 - 18
Gov TechTalks Lunch & Learn Session 7: Application Security Feb 15 - 15
SANS Secure India 2012 Feb 20 - 25
The Airport Law Enforcement Symposium Feb 23-24, 2012 Feb 23 - 24
Learn How to Simplify Data Management and Reduce Storage Costs - with Steak & Eggs Feb 23 - 23
Physical Security: Introductory Applications and Technology Feb 27 - Mar 1
Conducting Corporate Investigations Feb 27 - 28
ISC CHINA 2012 (International Security Conference & Exposition CHINA) Feb 27 - 29
RSA Conference 2012 Feb 27 - Mar 2
SAP Public Sector Partner Exchange Feb 28 - 28
SANS Secure Singapore 2012 Mar 5 - 17
SANS Germany 2012 Mar 5 - 10
Homeland Security Finance Forum 2012 Mar 6 - 6
Basic Hands-On CAMEO Training Mar 12 - 14
ASIS Assets Protection Course: Principles of Security (APC I) Mar 12 - 15
SANS Mobile Device Security Summit 2012 Mar 12 - 15
Aviation Week's Innovation Challenge Showcase Mar 13 - 14
Symantec Government Technology Summit Mar 20 - 20
STI at SANS 2012 Mar 23 - 30
SANS 2012 Mar 23 - 30
The 9th Two Day Conference On Indian Medical Devices & Plastics Disposables Industry 2012 Mar 23 - 24
SANS Northern Virginia 2012 Apr 15 - 20
Active Shooter Apr 18 - 19
SANS AppSec 2012 Apr 24 - May 2
SANS Cyber Guardian 2012 Apr 30 - May 7
Telework Exchange Spring 2012 Town Hall Meeting May 2 - 2
5th Sample Prep - Sample Preparation for Virus, Toxin, & Pathogen Detection & Identification May 3 - 4
SANS Security West 2012 May 10 - 18
SANS Toronto 2012 May 14 - 19
Counter Terror Expo US May 16 - 17
CEIC 2012 (Computer and Enterprise Investigations Conference) May 21 - 24
SANS Rocky Mountain 2012 Jun 4 - 9
Data Center Brainstorm 2012 Jun 19 - 19
SANS Forensics and Incident Response Summit 2012 Jun 21 - 27
Vanguard Security & Compliance 2012 Jun 25 - 28
SANS Canberra 2012 Jul 2 - 10